Comments on: Local Sockets Support http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210 News and discussion for the POCO Community Thu, 09 May 2013 12:05:16 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: electic http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-450 electic Sun, 05 Apr 2009 04:24:29 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-450 I wish there was a way to write properties in XMLConfiguration. I get a: Not implemented: Setting a property in an XMLConfiguration. So that is my wish:D I wish there was a way to write properties in XMLConfiguration. I get a: Not implemented: Setting a property in an XMLConfiguration. So that is my wish:D

]]> By: alex http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-448 alex Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:27:14 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-448 > Can’t wait to see 1.3.4 Just to set the record straight: this will NOT be in 1.3.4 > Can’t wait to see 1.3.4

Just to set the record straight: this will NOT be in 1.3.4

]]> By: Viet http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-447 Viet Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:20:32 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-447 Can't wait to see 1.3.4 :) Hopefully it will be released this week. Can’t wait to see 1.3.4 :) Hopefully it will be released this week.

]]> By: alex http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-446 alex Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:42:09 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-446 I'd be curious to see the results for other platforms. Also, I slapped this together rather quickly, so a double-check of my testing code is by all means welcome. The code is in <a href="http://poco.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/poco/sandbox/Sockets/testsuite/src/DatagramLocalSocketTest.cpp?view=markup" rel="nofollow">DatagramLocalSocketTest::testDatagramSocketPerformance() </a> and <a href="http://poco.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/poco/sandbox/Sockets/testsuite/src/LocalSocketTest.cpp?view=markup" rel="nofollow">LocalSocketTest::testSocketsPerformance() </a> I’d be curious to see the results for other platforms. Also, I slapped this together rather quickly, so a double-check of my testing code is by all means welcome. The code is in DatagramLocalSocketTest::testDatagramSocketPerformance()
 and LocalSocketTest::testSocketsPerformance()

]]> By: guenter http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-445 guenter Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:48:16 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-445 Thanks. I find these numbers quite interesting. Thanks. I find these numbers quite interesting.

]]> By: alex http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210&cpage=1#comment-444 alex Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:15 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=210#comment-444 Just to make sure the work was not in vain (and to please Günter ;-), I've ran some tests (positive percentage means local sockets are faster): </br></br> <table> <tr><td>Platform</td><td>UDP</td><td>TCP</td><td>TCP NODELAY</td></tr> <tr><td>Open Solaris (SunOs 5.11)</td><td align='right'>-24.5%</td><td align='right'>10.4%</td><td align='right'>17.3%</td></tr> <tr><td>Linux (Ubuntu 2.6.27-7 32 bit)</td><td align='right'>4.6%</td><td align='right'>87.0%</td><td align='right'>98.3%</td></tr> <tr><td>Linux (Gentoo 2.6.11-r6 32 bit)</td><td align='right'>8.1%</td><td align='right'>37.2%</td><td align='right'>40.0%</td></tr> <tr><td>Linux (Ubuntu 2.6.27-9 64 bit)</td><td align='right'>20.8%</td><td align='right'>40.6%</td><td align='right'>41.7%</td></tr> </table> Just to make sure the work was not in vain (and to please Günter ;-) , I’ve ran some tests (positive percentage means local sockets are faster):

Platform UDP TCP TCP NODELAY
Open Solaris (SunOs 5.11) -24.5% 10.4% 17.3%
Linux (Ubuntu 2.6.27-7 32 bit) 4.6% 87.0% 98.3%
Linux (Gentoo 2.6.11-r6 32 bit) 8.1% 37.2% 40.0%
Linux (Ubuntu 2.6.27-9 64 bit) 20.8% 40.6% 41.7%
]]>