Comments on: Analysis of POCO Source Code http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252 News and discussion for the POCO Community Thu, 09 May 2013 12:05:16 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Seth http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252&cpage=1#comment-517 Seth Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:25:54 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252#comment-517 Me too :_) Thanks for the correction. It was called for! Me too :_) Thanks for the correction. It was called for!

]]> By: guenter http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252&cpage=1#comment-508 guenter Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:26:51 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252#comment-508 I have responded <a href="http://cppdepend.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/why-poco-is-well-implemented-and-designed/#comment-7" rel="nofollow">there</a>. I have responded there.

]]> By: Seth http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252&cpage=1#comment-507 Seth Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:57:10 +0000 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=252#comment-507 On the large, everything is peaches with the design. I love it and prefer PoCo (greatly) over anything boost-y or ACE-y. It is just so much simpler to use. On the detail level there are the usual annoyances. I will post my critical notes at the original report because it seemed to be about the report than my satisfaction with Poco. So head over to read it if you wish: http://cppdepend.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/why-poco-is-well- implemented-and-designed/#comment-5 Cheers On the large, everything is peaches with the design. I love it and prefer PoCo (greatly) over anything boost-y or ACE-y. It is just so much simpler to use.

On the detail level there are the usual annoyances.

I will post my critical notes at the original report because it seemed to be about the report than my satisfaction with Poco. So head over to read it if you wish:

http://cppdepend.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/why-poco-is-well-
implemented-and-designed/#comment-5

Cheers

]]>