Comments on: Have you ever seen anything like STL? http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=66 News and discussion for the POCO Community Sun, 26 May 2013 14:39:39 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: tovorinok http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=66&cpage=1#comment-183 tovorinok Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:23:10 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=66#comment-183 Hello Great book. I just want to say what a fantastic thing you are doing! Good luck! G'night Hello

Great book. I just want to say what a fantastic thing you are doing! Good luck!

G’night

]]> By: alex http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=66&cpage=1#comment-182 alex Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:22:13 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=66#comment-182 Oh, I agree, now looking back, sure - it is expected to work. And it's not a rocket science, either. However, my amazement was actually over more than STL. Namely, there's more entities involved here of which only one is STL. There is PocoData library where Extraction template specializations for STL containers and TypeHandlers for Tuples live. Then there is the ODBC DataConnector, which is a PocoData back-end and has actually nothing to do with this issue, but that's not obvious immediately. I was simply expecting something to bomb on me - either at compile or runtime. But nothing did and that amazed me and inspired my post. Oh, I agree, now looking back, sure – it is expected to work. And it’s not a rocket science, either. However, my amazement was actually over more than STL. Namely, there’s more entities involved here of which only one is STL. There is PocoData library where Extraction template specializations for STL containers and TypeHandlers for Tuples live. Then there is the ODBC DataConnector, which is a PocoData back-end and has actually nothing to do with this issue, but that’s not obvious immediately. I was simply expecting something to bomb on me – either at compile or runtime. But nothing did and that amazed me and inspired my post.

]]> By: Stuart Dootson http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=66&cpage=1#comment-181 Stuart Dootson Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:30:19 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=66#comment-181 I must have got complacent about C++/STL - I would *expect* that to work :-) I do still get excited over how pattern matching in template specialisations (partial or full) works so well. It's only matched by how easy Haskell makes it to write complex code. I must have got complacent about C++/STL – I would *expect* that to work :-)

I do still get excited over how pattern matching in template specialisations (partial or full) works so well. It’s only matched by how easy Haskell makes it to write complex code.

]]>