http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=97 News and discussion for the POCO Community Sun, 26 May 2013 14:39:39 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=97&cpage=1#comment-261 guenter Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:20:49 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=97#comment-261 <nitpicking>Not exactly GPL; the original POCO license was similar to the Sleepycat license.</nitpicking> <nitpicking>Not exactly GPL; the original POCO license was similar to the Sleepycat license.</nitpicking>

]]> http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=97&cpage=1#comment-260 alex Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:36:24 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=97#comment-260 Things can and do change. POCO used to be GPL, too. Things can and do change. POCO used to be GPL, too.

]]> http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=97&cpage=1#comment-259 Ville Vainio Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:21:59 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=97#comment-259 It is GPL, so it's basically useless (GPL is an extremely crappy license for a library). It is GPL, so it’s basically useless (GPL is an extremely crappy license for a library).

]]> http://pocoproject.org/blog/?p=97&cpage=1#comment-258 paschal Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:48:54 +0000 http://appinf.com/poco/blog/?p=97#comment-258 It is GPL. How times have changed. Intel the only vendor still charging for a c/c++ compiler is releasing a key library as open source. If this was 7 years ago, you would be looking at thousands of dollars for a site license It is GPL. How times have changed. Intel the only vendor still charging for a c/c++ compiler is releasing a key library as open source. If this was 7 years ago, you would be looking at thousands of dollars for a site license

]]>