Delegates help

[LeeTL1220]

In the May 27,2007 blog post (http://pocoproject.org/poco/blog/index.php?s=delegates), there is a code snippet using delegates (as opposed to the parameterized Delegate class).

Has this been implemented yet?

I am using Poco 1.3.1, should I be using 1.3.2? I get build errors and I just wanted to make sure that this is not just my own error.

Thanks for any help.

[peter]

> In the May 27,2007 blog post (http://pocoproject.org/poco/blog/index.php?s=delegates), there is a code snippet using delegates (as opposed to the parameterized Delegate class).
>
> Has this been implemented yet?

UPDATE:

The feature is implemented but its not yet integrated in the 1.3 version.
Anybody requiring the new delegate syntax+extensions please use the trunk version.

br

Peter

>
> I am using Poco 1.3.1, should I be using 1.3.2? I get build errors and I just wanted to make sure that this is not just my own error.
>
> Thanks for any help.

[LeeTL1220]

> In the May 27,2007 blog post (http://pocoproject.org/poco/blog/index.php?s=delegates), there is a code snippet using delegates (as opposed to the parameterized Delegate class).
>
> Has this been implemented yet?
>
> I am using Poco 1.3.1, should I be using 1.3.2? I get build errors and I just wanted to make sure that this is not just my own error.
>
> Thanks for any help.

I tried both of those before I posted (I should have mentioned that).

I got the longhand form working, i.e. Delegate(...), which is fine for now.

Thanks for the help!

[peter]

> > In the May 27,2007 blog post (http://pocoproject.org/poco/blog/index.php?s=delegates), there is a code snippet using delegates (as opposed to the parameterized Delegate class).
> >
> > Has this been implemented yet?
> >
> > I am using Poco 1.3.1, should I be using 1.3.2? I get build errors and I just wanted to make sure that this is not just my own error.
> >
> > Thanks for any help.
>
> I tried both of those before I posted (I should have mentioned that).
>
> I got the longhand form working, i.e. Delegate(...), which is fine for now.
>
> Thanks for the help!

Hmm, strange. Did you try to shorten the working long hand version to the shorter one? I guess you just had the method signature wrong?