Add-Ons & Services

namespaces and syntactic sugar

General discussion regarding the development of POCO for contributors.

namespaces and syntactic sugar

Postby marlowa » 24 Jul 2006, 20:49

I like what I have seen of POCO so far so I am reluctant to kick things off with a negative post, but... why does POCO use syntactic sugar for namespace scoping? E.g instead of:

namespace Fred {
blah blah

we have:

blah blah

I don't see what practical benefit comes from this style. Can someone enlighten me please?

-Andrew Marlow

Posts: 36
Joined: 19 Jul 2006, 09:02
Location: United_Kingdom

Re: namespaces and syntactic sugar

Postby guenter » 26 Jul 2006, 09:08

The original idea behind it was to make it easier one day to change namespaces (e.g., put a top-level POCO namespace around everything), without having to change too much source code.

Another side effect is that it saves (at least) one level of indentation.
Posts: 1168
Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:27
Location: Austria

Return to Contributors

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest